339–348.
Burger, J.M. (in press). Replicating Milgram: Would people still obey today? American Psychologist.
Burger, J.M. & Caldwell, D.F. (2003). The effects of monetary incentives and labeling on the foot-in-the-door-effect. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 25, 235–241.
Burger, J.M., Petty, R.E. (1981). The low-ball compliance technique: Task or person commitment? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40,492–500.
Burger, J.M., Horita, M., Kinoshita, L., Roberts, K., Vera, C. (1997). Effects of time on the norm of reciprocity. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 19,91–100.
Burger, J.M., Messian, N., Patel, S., del Prado, A., Anderson, C. (2004). What a coincidence! The effects of incidental similarity on compliance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30,35–43.
Burgoon, M., Alvaro, E., Grandpre, J., Voulodakis, M. (2002). Revisiting the theory of psychological reactance. In J.P. Dillard and M. Pfau (Eds.), The persuasion handbook: Theory and practice(pp. 213–232). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Burn, S.W. (1991). Social psychology and the stimulation of recycling behaviors: The block leader approach. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21,611–629.
Bushman, B.J. (1988). The effects of apparel on compliance. Personality and Social PsychologyBulletin, 14,459–467.
Buss, D.M., Kenrich, D.T. (1998). Evolutionary social psychology. In D.T. Gilbert, S.T. Fiske & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology(4th ed.) (Vol. 2, pp. 982–1026). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Carducci, B.J., Deuser, P.S., Bauer, A., Large, M., Ramaekers, M. (1989). An application of the foot-in-the-door technique to organ donation. Journal of Business and Psychology, 4,245–249.
Castellow, W.A., Wuensch, K.L., Moore, C.H. (1990). Effects of physical attractiveness of the plaintiff and defendant in sexual harassment judgments. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 5, 547–562.
Chaiken, S. (1979). Communicator physical attractiveness and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1387–1397.
Chaiken, S. (1986). Physical appearance and social influence. In C.P. Herman, M.P. Zanna & E.T. Higgins (Eds.), Physical appearance, stigma, and social behavior: The Ontario Symposium(Vol. 3, pp. 143–177). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Chaiken, S., Trope, Y. (Eds.) (1999). Dual-process theories in social psychology.New York: Guilford.
Chajut, E., Algom, D. (2003). Selective attention improves under stress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 231–248.
Chartrand, T.L., Bargh, J.A. (1999). The chameleon effect: The perception-behavior link and social interaction.