Brunswik E.Probability as a determiner of rat behavior // J. Exp. Psychol. 1939.25.
Brunswik E.Organismic achievement and environmental probability // Psychol. Rev. 1943. 50.
Cowper D., Stewin L.An examination of illusion phenomenon in Soviet set theory: An experimental critique // The Alberta J. of Educational Research. 1974. Vol. 20.
Dashiell J. F.Fundamentals of objective psychology. N.Y., 1928.
Dashiell J. F.A neglected fourth dimension in psychological research // Psychol. Rev. 1940.47.
Deese J.Some problems of theory of vigilance // Psychol. Rev. 1955. 62.
Forgus R. H.Perception. N.Y., 1966.
Fraisse P.Le role des attitudes dans la perception j ILes Attitudes. Paris, 1961.
Freeman G.LThe problem of set //Amer. J. Psychol». 1939. 52.
Gibson J. J.A critical review of the concept of set in contemporary experimental psychology //Psychol. Bull. 1941. 38.
Haber R. N.The nature of the effect of set on perception // Psychol. Rev. 1966. 73.
Hebb D. O.The organization of behavior. N.Y., 1949.
Herzog R.L, Unruh W. R.Toward a unification of the Uznadze theory of set and Western theories of human functioning // Psychological investigations. A. S. Prangichvili (Ed.). Tbilisi, 1973.
Hritzuk J, Janzen H. A comparison of ustanovka and Einstellung: Uznadze and Luchins // Psychological investigations. A. S. Prangichvili (Ed.). Tbilisi, 1973.
Ittelson W. H. The constancies of perceptual theory // Psychol. Rev. 1951.58.
Jarvik M. E. Probability learning and negative recency effect in the serial anticipation of alternative symbols // J. Exp. Psychol.1951.41.
Kilpatrick F. P. Motivation, perception and action. Washington, 1953.
Luchins A. S. Mechanization in problem solving // Psychol. Monogr. 1942. Vol. 54.
Marks R. W. The effect of probability, desirability and «privilege» on the stated expectations of children // J. Personal. 1951. 19.
Messick S. J., Soliey C. M. Probability learning in children: Some exploratory studies //J. Genet. Psychol. 1957. 90.
Oldfield R. C., Zangwill O.L. Bartlett’s theory of memory // Brit. J. Psychol. 1942. 32.
Park C. The Soviet theory of set — an evaluation. A thesis. Univ. of Alberta, Alberta, 1974.
Paschal F. The trend in theories of attention // Psychol. Rev. 1941.48.
Postman L., Crutchfield R. S. The interaction of need, set and stimulus structure in a cognitive task // Amer. J. Psychol. 1952. 65.
Sherif M. A. A study of some social factors in perception //Arch. Psychol. 1935. Vol. 187.
Siipola E. M. A group study of some effects of preparatory set // Psychol. Monogr. 1935. Vol. 46.